tiggerallyn

That From The Book of Revelation, Yes?

"And I suspect that what you'll see, Toby, is that there will be a momentum, momentum will be gathered. Houses will begat jobs, jobs will begat houses."
— George W. Bush, talking to reporters along the hurricane-ravaged Gulf Coast, Gulfport, MS, August 28, 2006

tiggerallyn

Oh, Yeah?

"I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees."
— George W. Bush, September 1, 2005, three days after the breach.

Exhibit A: Gov. Kathleen Blanco said in a CNN interview on August 27 that the storm could bring a 15- to 20-foot surge of water and the people of New Orleans "will not survive that if indeed it happens."

Exhibit B: Federal disaster officials warned Bush and his homeland security chief during the August 28 session "the storm could breach levees."

Exhibit C: New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin told a new conference on August 29: "The storm surge most likely will topple our levee system."

Exhibit D: FEMA Director Brown testified that prior to the disaster "in my conversations with the president and with the chief of staff; our concern was always the breach of the levees."

http://www.allyngibson.net/?p=2026

Two weeks ago I wrote that presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama was reconsidering his campaign’s space policy — his education plan was funded by taking money from NASA (and the development of Constellation, the follow-up to the Shuttle) and diverting it into elementary education. Obama had begun to make noises that he was going to continue funding NASA, perhaps even increase its funding.

Constellation is a smidge important. The Space Shuttle fleet is being retired in 2010. Constellation would not come online until 2015 at the earliest, leaving the United States dependent upon Russia for ferrying astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station.

Obama’s presumptive opponent, Republican John McCain has a plan.

He just wants to keep flying the Shuttle.

Is that really a plan? Is that really even feasible?

No. And absosmurfly not.

McCain’s reasoning makes sense — in the aftermath of Georgia, McCain feels that the United States cannot trust Georgia — but it’s a plan that defies practicality and feasibility.

One, the Shuttles cannot last forever. That’s why the United States needs to develop something to take their place.

Two, some Shuttle components are already beyond their rated lifespans. The RCS propellant tanks, for instance, had a twenty-year lifespan. Twenty years passed eight or nine years ago.

Three, spending the money to keep the shuttles flying in the short term keeps NASA from developing Constellation in a timely basis over the long-term, unless McCain is planning on throwing money at NASA to do both.

I understand that McCain wants to play tough with Russia. I understand that McCain wants a new “Cold War” so he can be as bellicose with Russia as Bush was with Iraq.

But like Bush and Iraq, bellicosity leads to stupid and ill-thought policy decisions. Decisions that will get people killed and don’t move us forward.

McCain’s space policy, like McCain himself, is nothing but a relic of a time that’s passed.

tiggerallyn

Two weeks ago I wrote that presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama was reconsidering his campaign’s space policy — his education plan was funded by taking money from NASA (and the development of Constellation, the follow-up to the Shuttle) and diverting it into elementary education. Obama had begun to make noises that he was going to continue funding NASA, perhaps even increase its funding.

Constellation is a smidge important. The Space Shuttle fleet is being retired in 2010. Constellation would not come online until 2015 at the earliest, leaving the United States dependent upon Russia for ferrying astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station.

Obama’s presumptive opponent, Republican John McCain has a plan.

He just wants to keep flying the Shuttle.

Is that really a plan? Is that really even feasible?

No. And absosmurfly not.

McCain’s reasoning makes sense — in the aftermath of Georgia, McCain feels that the United States cannot trust Georgia — but it’s a plan that defies practicality and feasibility.

One, the Shuttles cannot last forever. That’s why the United States needs to develop something to take their place.

Two, some Shuttle components are already beyond their rated lifespans. The RCS propellant tanks, for instance, had a twenty-year lifespan. Twenty years passed eight or nine years ago.

Three, spending the money to keep the shuttles flying in the short term keeps NASA from developing Constellation in a timely basis over the long-term, unless McCain is planning on throwing money at NASA to do both.

I understand that McCain wants to play tough with Russia. I understand that McCain wants a new “Cold War” so he can be as bellicose with Russia as Bush was with Iraq.

But like Bush and Iraq, bellicosity leads to stupid and ill-thought policy decisions. Decisions that will get people killed and don’t move us forward.

McCain’s space policy, like McCain himself, is nothing but a relic of a time that’s passed.